Total FM
A new age in waste management? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Ian Baxter, July 2006   
There is nothing new about recycling as an objective, but there are new and growing pressures on businesses to act responsibly and comprehensively to manage waste. There is no doubt that general awareness of the concepts of sustainability and corporate social responsibility has increased immeasurably over the past five years, with the Government having put forward compelling arguments for companies to integrate the type of responsible business practices that sustainability demands into everyday processes and operations, new legislation and the growing sophistication of pressure groups to communicate successfully with business without confrontation.

With this new found consciousness and co-operation has come a willingness within business to review practices, processes and mindsets with a view to creating a working environment that is sustainable in the absolute, fully considering all elements of the resources required to maintain delivery.

One element of this programme of review that has received particular attention is the management of waste arising from commercial organisations. The concept of sustainable waste management isn't something new within the UK, but it has resurfaced with a renewed sense of purpose as various reports detailing mankind's impacts on the environment have been circulated. While waste is typically only 5-10 per cent of an organisation's environmental impact, it is often the initial focal point for change, and, more often than not, one of the more complex.

The fundamental difficulties are two-fold: effective engagement with waste generators within the organisation, and the successful appointment and management of sub-contractors that share the organisation's environmental objectives.

Until the mid-1960s, the UK's population recognised the value of re-using and recycling materials. Believe it or not, the first material recycling facilities in this country opened in the late 1800s, and the last rag and bone man only ceased operation in 1967. It is only as industry, and population, have moved over the past 40 years towards an increasingly consumer-based economy that the tried and tested practices of the past have seemed to become an alien concept. The drivers behind the habits of yesterday were quite simple: people understood that to survive economically, materials needed to be preserved and re-used or recycled.

New drivers

Today's needs for the reintroduction of sustainable waste management are similarly pressing, but have significantly more serious consequences. And this is the very key with which to secure successful engagement with waste generators.

For instance, the UK currently consumes in excess of twice the natural resources available from its geographic area. And if that statistic in itself is not enough, the planet's population is currently consuming natural resources at a rate equivalent to three planets.

Confronted with information such as this, the need for a change in how waste generators handle and dispose of their waste is no longer a subject worthy of emotive debate; that took place in the 1980s and 1990s. It is now clearly time for responsible action.

Having said that, it is of fundamental importance that generators of waste understand their own individual contribution to these statistics, how they can make a more positive contribution, and what benefits their positive actions can have.

Commercially, in a typical office environment occupants will generate approximately 0.25 tonnes of waste material per annum, which is largely recyclable. To put this situation into better context, approximately 2.5 tonnes of natural resources are consumed just to produce this waste material, assuming it is of virgin origin. Contained within this quarter of a tonne of waste material produced, one would typically expect the following breakdown of materials arising:
  • 175kg of mixed paper waste;
  • 12.5kg of cardboard;
  • 25kg of plastic waste;
  • 7.5kg of metal waste;
  • 30kg of mixed food waste and non-recyclables.

This proves quite clearly that, if given the correct facilities, over 85 per cent of all waste generated within an office environment can be - and should be - recycled.

In terms of the benefits of achieving such levels of recycling, these are, at the very least, three-fold:
  • Job creation - it is estimated that for every 10,000 tonnes of waste material recycled, 39 jobs are created. 10,000 tonnes of waste material landfilled will create approximately six jobs; 10,000 tonnes of waste material incinerated will create approximately three jobs.
  • Natural resource consumption reduction - recycling of paper alone generates 74 per cent less pollution; water consumption is reduced by 35 per cent; 64 per cent less energy is used.
  • Preservation of natural habits - reduction in deforestation, earth crust removal, drilling for oil etc.

Finding the right solution

For waste generators to deliver change, it is evident that they must recognise their impacts, accept individual responsibility and fully appreciate the positive benefits their efforts can have.

The second element of the challenge, the successful appointment and management of sub-contractors that share the organisation's environmental objectives, is potentially the most difficult element for several reasons:
  • There is no such thing as a one-stop-shop within the market that fully embraces the principle of best practice;
  • There is limited investment within the UK in recycling infrastructure;
  • Limited storage space exists within facilities to accommodate all disposal equipment for all materials that require disposal/ recycling;
  • Inconsistent messages and information emanate from the waste and recycling market, causing confusion;
  • The economic volatility of markets for recyclable materials.

And when the full range of waste generated within a commercial environment is considered, this challenge is even more complex. A brief summary of the range includes:
  • Mixed paper waste;
  • Plastic cups;
  • Waxed paper cups;
  • Plastic bottles;
  • Used beverage cans;
  • Timber;
  • Cardboard;
  • Polythene;
  • Scrap metal;
  • Furniture;
  • Batteries;
  • Oils;
  • Food waste;
  • IT equipment;
  • Audio visual equipment;
  • Paint;
  • Cleaning chemicals;
  • Grounds maintenance waste;
  • Storage media;
  • Fluorescent tubes;
  • Polystyrene;
  • Glass;
  • Sanitary / clinical waste.


When approaching the successful management of all these waste streams and the variables associated in actually specifying the services, it is quite clear how challenging it is to deliver a fully comprehensive best practice and best value service. By the same token, it is of course equally difficult for any organisation within the industry to be everything to everybody. So how do you approach this?

The key is for people seeking to undertake a sustainable approach to waste management to be realistic and not try to achieve too much too quickly. The waste management and recycling industry is one packed full of creative and intelligent people who have a lot of answers to the challenges but, due to the continual focus upon successful economic management, do not necessarily have in place the physical solutions required themselves. The solutions are out there in the industry, but they do require a broad view of the market, effective supplier management and a willingness to support the recycling market by becoming a purchaser of goods manufactured from recycled materials.

There are a number of organisations that might promote the benefits of off-site segregation of waste - a practice dating back to the late 1800s; but this will invariably fail to provide the transparency necessary to successfully engage with the waste generators. In addition, the economic focus of the industry remains intact and therefore the more waste handled by such facilities, the more revenue and profit generated. For these facilities truly to deliver recycling to their full potential, the economic argument against landfill and for recycling must develop to such a level that there is a real incentive to minimise the amount of waste being disposed of to landfill. And this is unlikely to arrive before 2010 when landfill tax alone is scheduled to achieve a rate of £35 per tonne.

Conclusion

So, in conclusion, how does a commercial generator of waste successfully specify a sustainable waste management service? There are numerous contractors in the UK that can provide this service. The following are some basic rules that can be of assistance, whichever provider you choose:

  • Prioritise source segregation of wastes.
  • Minimise the initial number of materials for segregation (mixed paper, rather than colour, white etc.) and disposal/recycling. It is better to increase the number of materials in time than to attempt to deliver and manage a wide range of materials.
  • Appoint contractors who can deliver the service you require, not the service that they can provide, and fully audit them to ensure their disposal routes are transparent and compliant. Take references.
  • Fully consider the internal handling implications of any recycling initiative and identify opportunities to minimise handling.
  • Recognise whenever possible the benchmark performance before commencing the initiative.
  • Agree reporting formats and timetables for receipt of statistics from contractors.
  • Schedule services to an agreed specification whenever possible with a regular programme of review to compare specification against usage and optimise where possible.
  • Schedule a regular programme of audits of sub-contractors to ensure continued compliance with legislation and the disposal routes agreed.


About the author
Ian Baxter is General Manager of MITIE Waste & Environmental. Please visit www.mitie.co.uk

 
< Prev   Next >